If you own stocks, bonds, homes or anything else for that matter, sell it now! take your money and hide for the next four years! Invest it all in precious metals and bury it! Mark my words, the economy is going to severly tank in the coming months! Good luck America! we will need it!

I must say I am beginning to know what the liberals are going through with their suffering with Bush Derangement Syndrome or BDS.  I am beginning to foster the opposite effect, the Barrack Hussein Obama Derangement Syndrome otherwise know as BHODS.  It is a more sever case of the Bill and Hillary Clinton Derangement Syndrome.  My disdain for this man is not the man himself, rather his positions, associations, and destructive aspirations for the future of this great nation.  The other opposites between BHODS and BDS is that when you suffer from BHODS, you really don't want harm to come to another human being, rather you just want to see them go away and live a long life.  My argument for my disdain for BHO follows.

The mere fact that Obama has associations that would prevent him from gaining employment from the CIA, NSA or FBI, yet having access to the most classified information our country has, is the single scariest concept I can think of.  What will Obama do with the knowledge he gains as president?  Will he expose our nations military secrets?  Will he expose our intelligence gathering technologies and agents to our enemies?  Will he sell out our nation to foreign powers that have wanted to see the destruction of the United States for the better part of a century?   Clinton did it, why wouldn't Obama?

Recent remarks by Barrack Obama have made it even harder to understand how people can even consider him as a president.  He now wants to create a national security police force. He thinks this is a good idea.  This is the stepping-stone to a tyrannical regime.  This idea is a means to step around the posse-comitatus act of 1878, preventing the military from enforcing civilian laws without the declaration of martial law.  Being a veteran, I am fully aware of the dangers of the federal government having that kind of control and power.  There has been no pursuit from Bush to abuse the power of the presidency, yet, the liberals call Bush a dictator.  Obama has made so many comments that are dictator like it scares me, yet his "followers" cheer his comments.  This is what the Nazi's did!

He has made comments to the SF Chronicle that he wants to bankrupt the coal industry because he thinks they offer no benefit to the American public; that coal is the cause of global warming.  Mark my words, if he gets elected, energy will become more expensive.  The poor and lower middle class will feel the pain worse than any other group in this nation.  Yet he preys on the poor, the lower middle class and the weak with words like "redistribute the wealth because its good for everyone and It's fair to increase the tax on stock dividends, even though it's proven that by doing so, will decrease the federal revenue.

I can continue to use his words against him as a case to despise the man, but I assume I have made my point.

For my outspokenness about BHO, I have been called a racist, stingy, uncaring and selfish, just to name a few adjectives.  These comments have come directly from friends, family and former co-workers.  Am I selfish?  The fact that I would rather give my money to charity and allow those who can afford it, to give to charities rather than the government makes me a bad person?  That I believe Obama spent 20 years in a race baiting church?  That thinking someone else deserves the income from someone who spends their entire life trying to live a good life and live the American dream is absurd.  That I believe in the Constitution of the United States and that one who thinks it’s an old out dated document should be re-educated in its very meaning?  That I think ones associations with terrorists, race pimps, felons and PLO members is terrible at best and criminal at worst?

If believing in the freedom the congressional congress and those who fought against tyranny provided me,then yes, I'm selfish, racist and uncaring.

On another note, I have to give kudos to Citizens United.  They produced a documentary called HYPE - The Obama Effect.

The DVD arrived the other day with little fanfare.  There were no parades, no sirens, clowns or even a circus in tow.  Just a simple DVD in a very nondescript envelope, that's all.

This documentary is the single best documentary I have seen on any politician, in my adult life.  I am sorry Mr. Hannity, but HYPE is even better than Hannity's America.

The way the argument is laid out is not to boost McCain, or any other person running for the presidency.  It is laid out to show the destructive behaviors Obama represents.   It laid out the dangerous tax policies, the lack of foresight, and frankly exposes each lie, and cover-up he has made in his political career.  Not to mention his 130 present votes in the Illinois Senate.

Well-done Citizens United!  Well Done!



Experience creates the best education -- period.

Sorry I'm late

Obama's definition of wealth is $250,000 per year. 
Let’s be clear, if you earn $250,000 you are rich.  But as we see that definition has changed from $250,000, to $200,000 and most recently $150,000.  But for sake of argument, Let's stick with $250,000.

If you earn 250,000 and you have a current tax rate of 36%, you pay to the federal government, $90,000 per year. Obama wants to raise that tax that from 36% to 39%. This change is $97,500.  What's an extra $7,500 for a rich guy?

His proposal is to uncap the Social Security Tax. The current rate is 15.3% if you are self employed 15.3% or $38,250. otherwise, @12% it’s $30,000. for you having the honor to work for a company.  What's an Extra $8,250 for my hard work being sef employed?

In the Free Peoples Democratic Republic of California (where I live today), the income tax rate is 9.3% (for $40,346 or more) or $23,250.  Yes, your state may be less or more, but this is where I live, so this is what I have to go with...

In California, we have to pay 7.7% unemployment insurance or $19,250.  Again, your state may differ so you may wan tto research this on your own.

Let’s break this down…

$250,000/yr income before any kind of deduction, but you are rich if you earn more than $250,000 so you may not deserve a deduction!

Taxes: Fed $97,500; SS $38,250 (if self employed); CA $23,250; Unemployment Insurance $19,250

                        Less the above $71,750/yr

If you choose not to own a home rather rent, and you earn $250,000 then chances are you don’t live in a shanty. So let’s say you pay $60,000/year in rent @$5000/mo which if you live in the SF Bay, LA or San Diego areas, $5000 isn't abnormal at all!

You are now left with $11,750/year to do what ever you want with… Who's Rich with $11,750? 

I have yet to add all other expenses like car, car insurance, phones, internet, cable, electricity, water, gas, oh and FOOD!  You know the luxuries of life. 

OK, back to me showing you how screwed you're going to be with Obama as president! 

If you own a home you may still have have a potential deduction. But you are rich, so let’s say the Obama Plan wants to take that away from you too… 

Home @ 500,000 (in CA that’s a condo at best unless you live in the desert) Property Tax rate approximately $6500/yr

Home @ 1,000,000 (in CA that’s about medium) Property Tax rate approximately $13000/yr

If @ $13,000 then this reduces your net income to $58,750/yr

Mortgage on $1,000,000 home $96,000/yr (if payments are $8,000/mo)

This leaves you with -$37,250/yr

Mortgage on $1,000,000 home $66,000/yr (if @5500/mo)

This leaves you with -$7,250/yr

I have yet to add all other expenses like car, car insurance, phones, internet, cable, electricity, water, gas., oh and FOOD!  You know the luxuries of life.

NOW WHO’S RICH MR. MARX?  I MEAN OBAMA????

FROM EACH ACCORDING TO HIS ABILITY TO EACH ACCORDING TO HIS NEEDS!

Article 1, Section 5 of the US Constitution

Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns

and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each

shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller

Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized

to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such

Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.

Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings,

punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the

Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.

Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and

from time to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as

may in their Judgment require Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays

of the Members of either House on any question shall, at the

Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.

Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without

the Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor

to any other Place than that in which the two Houses shall be

sitting.

The original intent by the founding fathers was not to have a single party system in the government.  They didn't even intend to have a system with two parties as the majority.  It was, at the time, a country with several parties, each as equal as the others.  Some may have caucused with others, but there were several non-the-less. 

If we look at world history, tyranny begins with a single party system.  Russia,  North Korea, Cuba,  Vietnam,  Myanmar,  Venezuela, Germany, Italy, Japan,  France, England,-Hungary,  Prussia,  the Ottoman Empire.  Need I go on?

This is the United States of America.  We are better than this.  Today, we have elected leaders running around suggesting that a single party rule would Rule, and that there would be better partisanship of the Democrats have a super majority.  Folks, the only thing I see is not bipartisanship, but total dominance of one party; suppressing the voice of the opposition. 

Moreover, who really wants to have bipartisanship anyway.  It's the single reason why out budget has bloated to 4 1/2 trillion Dollars, but that's a different topic all together...